Creating a Profession for PLM Practitioners |
||||||||||||||||||
The Home of Professional PLMThe PLM industry needs a recognised, worldwide professional structure for the people who work within it. The Professional PLM Initiative has been set up to fulfil this need. |
The Initiative covers the whole spectrum of what it means to be 'professional' in PLM. This will be a significant step forward, and will change the way that PLM practitioners work. |
The Initiative is inclusive and interactive. This web site shows the latest developments, and how you can get involved. |
||||||||||||||||
Professional PLM - The Debate
|
Professional PLM - The Debate
If you value your career as a PLM practitioner, and the work that you do in PLM, then you will be looking for recognition of this from your non-PLM colleagues. If you are hiring new PLM staff, or paying for a consultancy or systems integrator to give you PLM advice and support, you want to know the calibre of the people you are choosing from. There is a need to establish some level or benchmark of internationally-recognised professional performance in PLM. The way forward could range from formal methods of training and qualification, to PLM becoming a genuine profession, alongside engineering, law, and accountancy. There are many issues to be debated, and collective decisions to be made. Some PLM practitioners value the freedom of working without assessment, and wonder whether there is a need for change at all. Many others will feel that it is time for their work to be valued and respected by their colleagues and employers. The PLMIG is leading a structured discussion process which has brought out many important points, as described below. Follow the debate, and add your views via the link at the end of the page. |
|||||||||||||||||
Professional PLM - The Debate
|
Disappearing Role The impulse that has given rise to this whole initiative is that the role of the PLM Manager in user companies is disappearing. For many years, PLM Managers have felt undervalued. Colleagues do not understand the complexity and importance of the role. Senior management seems unaware of the benefits that PLM brings to the business, and of the contribution that the PLM Manager makes to this. Now this apathy means that more and more companies are adopting PLM without any specialist PLM Manager in place at all. This is having a massive impact on PLM viability. If an organisation believes that their new PLM system will solve all of their problems, it is hard to explain that they will need a qualified person to run it. And even harder to explain that many of the underlying 'As-Is' problems could be fixed by this PLM Manager before the IT platform even arrives. This in itself should be a driver for a move towards PLM professionalism. And then, of course, there are many other types of PLM practitioner for whom professionalism is just as important. |
|||||||||||||||||
Professional PLM - The Debate
|
PLM as a Career Move However much you enjoy working as a PLM practitioner, you need to bear in mind that it is part of your career, and will be the first thing under scrutiny in your next job interview. PLM management includes the work of an engineer, business analyst, data scientist, project manager, operational improvement specialist, culture change expert, senior line manager, and director/VP. You must be able to do all of those things, but your next potential employer may fail to understand this - particularly if your next move is outside the specific area of PLM. How can you receive credit for your achievements if the interviewer does not really understand PLM? How can you show the progression that you have made if you have no formal qualifications? And does the fact that fewer companies are hiring PLM Managers mean that your current career is something of a dead end? Perhaps career paths migrate are migrating from internal roles at user companies towards vendors and integrators. But even here there is a risk that "PLM advisor" looks like post-sales IT support, rather than the business-oriented role that it should be. |
|||||||||||||||||
Professional PLM - The Debate
|
Starting the Discussion Given the above-mentioned warning signs and career implications, the PLMIG contacted most of the main players in PLM training and certification to ask for their views. For consistency, they were all asked four questions:-
The initial responses were very interesting and are summarised below. |
|||||||||||||||||
Professional PLM - The Debate
|
No Need for a Profession? Nate Hartman of Purdue University looks at the whole question in a different light. He says:-
This is a sensible argument. Rather than having a specific new profession, PLM practitioners could work with existing professions so that they update themselves to incorporate modern PLM aspects. It would minimise overheads, and save PLM practitioners having to become officers of a new professional body. The counter-argument is to ask how PLM practitioners would organise themselves to liaise with these other professions? How would they agree amongst themselves the standards or criteria that the other professions should adopt? And how would they maintain this integration into the long-term future? |
|||||||||||||||||
Professional PLM - The Debate
|
The Beginnings of a Profession Possibly the most advanced initiative to formalise the professional elements of 'PLM practice' is running in Germany, with Fraunhofer and a group of industrial partners. The key feature is that the examination and certification is completely separate from the training element. Richard Baumann of Volkswagen Group (one of the industrial partners) explains: "There are two initiatives regarding PLM expertise which we have to distinguish: PLM education and PLM certification. In the area of education, various different activities are taking place. Fraunhofer has established a PLM professional training that basically reaches the level of a university add-on course of studies. Companies like Volkswagen Group and Daimler have started to establish their own PLM education programs. PDM/PLM System vendors run their own internal education programs. All of these aim at the specific requirements of PLM." "Quite separately, the Fraunhofer Personnel Certification Authority has recently established a certification process for PLM Experts, called the 'PLM Professional Certificate'. Technically the certification process complies with ISO 17024. Content-wise a board of experts defines PLM knowledge fields and skills and examination relevant procedures and content. Certification regulations are publically available. As of May, 2017, four examinations have taken place, 37 of 51 candidates passed and received certification." In other words, the examination can be taken independently of the training, and it is possible to fail. These are key features of any professional qualification. | |||||||||||||||||
Professional PLM - The Debate
|
The Need to Professionalise It seems that some form of 'Professional PLM' initiative will still be required, even the profession is to be in 'embedded' or 'distributed' mode. Richard Baumann of Volkswagen Group is in favour of a more focused approach.
It is also possible to take a wider view of who is a 'PLM Practitioner'. The PLM Institute in Geneva has established separate courses for PLM technical staff and for wider members of the PLM Team. At Purdue University, Nathan Hartman notes that:-
This is also inherent in the CIMdata approach. Peter Bilello confirms:-
Peter, too, feels that the PLM industry should organise itself as a profession, given the the significant impact it has (or should have) on companies. He concludes:-
| |||||||||||||||||
Professional PLM - The Debate
|
Professional PLM - The Premise The discussion continued with more support for relying on other professions. Bryan Fraser of the NASA John H. Glenn Research Center observes that:-
Colin Bull of SQS feels that the disciplines that PLM covers already have a number of recognised career paths. For example: Requirements and System Engineering, Design and Engineering, Manufacturing and Engineering, Plant Engineering, Service, MRO, Quality, and Portfolio Management are all disciplines with their own careers. All of which indicates that PLM is a discipline that cuts across many others that have their own professional development paths; and may be difficult to teach as a coherent, widely-applicable syllabus. The problem with this line of thought is that it is difficult to make it lead to any change in the status quo. Everything stays as it is. And we are not satisfied with the way that it is. In order to initiate some impetus towards action and improvement, therefore, the following premise is proposed:-
This means that, to continue the drive for improvement, we must first establish why PLM is special. | |||||||||||||||||
Professional PLM - The Debate
|
Is PLM Special? There was feedback on this too, including this point by Erik Løber of BoostPLM:-
Holger Schrader of ZF is another who is in favour of professionalisation:-
Holger also makes another good point. A PLM Manager is unlikely to become CEO armed with this specialist but unrecognised responsibility - whereas the other professional specialisms are all valid steps on the career path to the top job. Stéphane Heno of DCNS feels that PLM practitioners need to be more professional, but is concerned that a professional qualification might focus too much on the IT aspects:-
And he continues with a point that many people will agree with:-
In fact, PLM is too important to let it be done by anyone who does not understand PLM. The PLM industry needs to make this clear, and establishing PLM as a profession would be the most powerful way of doing this. |
|||||||||||||||||
Professional PLM - Navigation
>>> PLM as a Profession
>>> The Background Debate [This Page] >>> Impact of a Profession >>> Roles and Grades >>> How the Roles Map >>> Endorsements >>> Steering Group >>> Working Group >>> Deliverables >>> How to Participate - [Back] |
Add Your Input This debate is likely to affect everyone who works as a PLM practitioner, in any capacity, in any type of organisation. The discussion needs to be inclusive and to represent the whole cross-section of opinion. We would like your input on any aspect of this, including (but not limited to):-
Let us know your views via profession@professionalplm.org. © Copyright 2023 PLM Interest Group |
|||||||||||||||||
<<< Return Home | ||||||||||||||||||
|